Dozens of project proposals were submitted for the first ever Doha Prize for Economic Innovation. Out of almost fifty applications from across the region, a group of twelve finalists were chosen to present their ideas and projects to a group of seven judges at the 9th Enriching the Middle East's Economic Future Conference. All twelve finalists showed outstanding commitment to addressing key social and economic problems within the MENA region, but five stood out for their depth of impact and the long-term sustainability of their projects.Read More
These articles represent the views of the authors only, and do not constitute the positions of UCLA, the International Institute, or the Center for Middle East Development. Readers are invited to offer alternative perspectives to csaleh[at]international.ucla.edu.
At the 9th annual "Enriching the Middle East's Economic Future" conference in Doha, Qatar, the Center for Middle East Development, the Doha Forum, and the Middle East Investment Initiative will name the winners of a new competition to support emerging start-ups and entrepreneurs in the MENA region.Read More
In drafting a better Crimea policy, the Obama administration should draw upon lessons from the Arab uprisings. Like the Crimea crisis, the Arab uprisings that began in December 2010 were (are) a critical period during which the US had an opportunity to shape outcomes that assured its long-term interest.
(Photo credit: Save_Ukraine | Statigram)Read More
by Steven L. Spiegel, Director of the UCLA Center for Middle East Development; Professor of Political Science at UCLA
It’s been a bad week. Everywhere I went, people interested in or associated with the Middle East were calling each other names. At UCLA Tuesday night a 12 hour meeting that began at 7:00 in the early evening and ended at 7:00 in the morning was held to determine whether the student council would adopt a resolution recommending divestment from several companies that do business in the West Bank. It was a gesture that could not be implemented because the University Regents had already declared they would not divest, but that didn’t stop the 600 or so students present from engaging in a bitter debate filled with vituperative and vicious name-calling, accusations filled with Islamophobia and anti-Semitism. When it was all over, the anti-divestment forces had won in a close 7-5 vote, but even the exhausted students were stunned by the virulence of the acrimony and the hostility. As student after student asked to see me to try to understand what had happened, I was stunned that placid UCLA in sunny southern California was suddenly afire with vitriol, hatred, and frustration such as had not been seen on campus since the Vietnam War. It will take a long time to recover from the depressing marathon.
My mother used to tell us growing up over and over again: “If you can’t say something constructive, don’t say it.” Until this week, I hadn’t thought about that phrase for years, though I’d like to say I follow it subconsciously, or try to. It’s very wise advice. The Middle East would be far better off if the saying was followed more often.
Some people may not like each other, and they may deeply disagree, which is understandable. But people shouldn't call each other (or the parties their opponents are defending) names and accuse them of all sorts of false and untrue crimes. As many UCLA students learned this week, when serious dialogue and interchange is replaced by chaotic screaming, no problems can be solved and no useful discussion can occur. To my utter consternation, the kind of confrontations I've avoided in my 25 years of mediating Middle East dialogue were creeping into the discourse. We shouldn’t and can’t have that; it will destroy and dishearten everyone engaged. It is what so defeated both sides in the UCLA student debate this week.
Rain finally came to drought-stricken Los Angeles this week; even the skies seemed to be in tears. I hope the rain washes away the bitterness and resentment, and I hope our little community keeps up a focus on positive resolutions and recommendations to make the region a better place. Odious comparisons and epithets hurled at others will only make matters worse. That’s not what we're here to accomplish, and that’s not what we want to do in the future. I hope you agree.
The successful American attempt to prohibit Iranian participation at the Geneva II peace talks on the Syrian crisis is a mistake. By excluding Iran, the United States action ignores the traditional political behavior of the ethnic and religious communities in the Levant and thus significantly decreases the chances of achieving tangible results in Geneva.Read More
US-Gulf relations are critical for stability, energy resources, investment, and other key US interests in the Middle East. The flurry of analysis in the Western press has been unanimous in emphasizing the need to reassure America’s Gulf allies. However, while these analyses are well reasoned, they overlook three important political conditions in the region.Read More